![]() |
|
By Peter Clark (Senior Editor, Autism Info Center) Thursday 29th January 2026 |
A study involving over 900 neurodivergent adults in the United Kingdom has highlighted a complex relationship with the terms "neurodiversity" and "neurodivergent." While the research, published in PsyPost, found that 74% of participants use this language to describe themselves, feelings toward the terminology remain mixed.
Many participants appreciate the term "neurodivergent" as a "safe umbrella" that fosters a sense of community and allows individuals to disclose their identity without the stigma sometimes attached to specific diagnoses like autism or ADHD.
It also provides a helpful label for those currently awaiting formal diagnosis.
However, the study revealed significant frustration regarding the frequent misuse of these terms.
Researchers emphasized that "neurodiverse" refers to a group containing a mix of all brain types, while "neurodivergent" refers specifically to those whose brains function differently from the societal "typical." For many, the incorrect use of "neurodiverse" by organizations is viewed as a "red flag" for performative inclusion.
Conversely, some critics feel the umbrella terms are too broad, potentially obscuring individual support needs or specific identities.
The researchers suggest that while these terms offer valuable utility, they should complement rather than replace specific diagnoses, and language should always be used with precision and respect.
Source: PsyPost (USA)
Copyright ©2026 Peter J. Clark T/A Autism Info Center / PsyPost (USA). All rights reserved worldwide. This information may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted, stored, indexed or distributed without the express written permission of the publisher, author, and copyright holder.